The Three Questions Of Matt. 24

As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately. "Tell us," they said, "when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?" (Matt. 24:3)

One of the mistakes we make in reading the Bible is caused by our tendency to look at everything through “Church colored glasses.”  By that I mean we read it as if everything applies directly to us without regard for the context or historical background.  I know Paul said everything that was written in the past was written to teach us (Romans 15:4) but that doesn't mean it was all written to us.  It means we're supposed to learn from the experiences of those who came before us.  A prime example of this kind of mistake can be found in our interpretation of the Olivet Discourse.  I'll show you what I mean. 

Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. "Do you see all these things?" he asked. "I tell you the truth, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down." (Matt. 24:1-2)

These two verses set the tone for the entire discussion, yet in our rush to get to the meat of the passage they are often ignored.  From Mark's account we know that after Jesus said this, four of the disciples came to Him for clarification.  They were Peter, James, John and Andrew (Mark 13:3), and they asked Him 3 questions.  When will this happen? (When will these buildings be torn down? ) What will be the sign of your coming? What will be the sign of the End of the Age? Let's  look at them individually to gain more of the background that prompted these questions.

                   When Will This Happen?   

The view of Jerusalem at sunset from the Mount of Olives is breathtaking, even today.  In the Lord's time it was even more so because the Temple was still standing. To them it was the most beautiful building imaginable.  The Hebrew Talmud says, “One who has not seen the Temple from the time of Herod has never seen a magnificent building.” It had been 46 years in the construction and was still not finished.  At sunset its white limestone exterior took on a bright golden hue, as if it was made of pure gold.  Repeating His Palm Sunday prophecy (Luke 19:41-44) Jesus said it would be so completely  destroyed that not one stone would be left standing on another.  Luke's version of the Olivet Discourse is the only one that gives a detailed answer to this question. (Luke 21:12-24.)

                   What Will Be The Sign Of Your Coming?

Obviously they meant His 2nd Coming and He actually gave them 2 clear signs. After describing several things that would not be specific signs, but merely “birth pangs”, He gave them the first one in Matt. 24:15.  It's the Abomination of Desolation standing in the Holy Place and it will mark the beginning of the Great Tribulation (Matt. 24:21).  The second sign is only described as the Sign of the Son of Man.  It will signal the Great Tribulation's end (Matt. 24:29). After that the Lord will return on the clouds with power and great glory.

                   What Will Be The Sign Of The End Of The Age? 

This question is more complex than they ever imagined when they asked it, even though the answer is simple.  Ultimately, the sign of the End of the Age will be the Lord's return.  This question is the one where so many believers are way off the mark. It's those “church colored glasses” I mentioned.  But when you understand the disciples' perspective you'll see that it was not possible for them to be thinking of the Church Age when they used the phrase “end of the age” like so many Christians assume.  Here's why.

Over 500 years previously the Angel Gabriel had told Daniel how and when the end of the age would come.  He said that from the time they received permission to restore and rebuild Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity there would be 70 periods of 7 years each (often called weeks because the Hebrew word Gabriel used means “a week of years”) for a total of 490 years (70 weeks). 

When the disciples asked their questions, 483 years (69 weeks)  had passed and there were only 7 years (1 week) left. You can imagine their astonishment when He told them that having come so close, just when the end was in sight it would all be destroyed.  How could this be?  Anointing the Most Holy referred to the Temple, under construction for 46 years and still not finished.  How could it be torn down and rebuilt in just 7 years?   

It was this astonishment that led to their questions. They didn't know anything about a Church Age that would cause a 2000 year pause in Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy.  Most of us today don't understand that the Church Age didn't end the Age of Law, it has just interrupted it.  How could they have understood it?  (The fact that the Age of Law hasn't ended explains why there will be a Temple erected in Israel soon.  Israel needs one to complete the final 7 years.) 

40 days after the Resurrection, even after receiving the Holy Spirit (John 20:22) they were still thinking that the End of the Age was at hand. When Jesus led them up to the Mount of Olives where He would soon ascend to the Father, they asked Him, “Lord are you at this time going to restore the Kingdom to Israel?” Once again He didn't explain anything about the future, but said, “It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.” (Acts 1:7-8)

                   I've Got A Secret

James revealed the answer to the Apostles for the first time 20 years after the cross.  

The whole assembly became silent as they listened to Barnabas and Paul telling about the miraculous signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. When they finished, James spoke up: "Brothers, listen to me. Simon (Peter) has described to us how God at first showed his concern by taking from the Gentiles a people for himself.  The words of the prophets are in agreement with this, as it is written:

“ 'After this I will return and rebuild David's fallen tent. Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it, that the remnant of men may seek the Lord, and all the Gentiles who bear my name, says the Lord, who does these things that have been known for ages.' “  (Acts 15:12-17)

Israel was being set aside while the Lord built the Church for Himself.  After He had taken us He would turn His attention once again to Israel.  If the Lord had taught them these things, James would not have had to explain it. It wasn't that they had heard this and forgotten it.  It was that the Lord had never told them.

And Paul claimed he was revealing an age old secret when he told the Church in Ephesus that through the Gospel gentiles were being made heirs together with Israel. (Ephes. 3:4-6)

Seen from this perspective it's clear that the Olivet Discourse is not about the Church.  It's the account of the Jewish Messiah speaking on the Mt. Of Olives to His Jewish followers about the future of Israel.  To underscore the point, in Matt. 24:15 He made reference to a Jewish Temple and in Matt. 24:16 He spoke of Old Covenant followers in Judea, the Biblical name for Israel, at the End of the Age.  Only  observant Jews would be unable to flee on a Sabbath.  These are the only specific references to a people group in the entire passage.  They both point to Israel and they're both written in the 2nd person (v. 15, when you see … v.20, pray that your flight … ), indicating that the Lord considered the disciples to be representative of Israel.  To place the Church in the Olivet Discourse is to make a fundamental error in interpretation.  (Only the pre-Trib Rapture position avoids this error.)

                   What's That There For?

So why is the Olivet Discourse even in the New Testament if it's not for the Church? There are several good reasons.  First it gives the Church some early warning signals we can use to know how close we're getting to our departure.  The birth pangs serve as “nearness indicators” in that the more frequently they occur the closer we are. Also, through out the entire Church Age the signs the Lord gave to Israel have not been in evidence, primarily because until 1948 there was no Israel.  This is what makes the re-birth of the nation the pre-imminent sign that the End Times are upon us.

Second, the absence of any reference to the Church shows us that we won't be here during the time He was talking about.

And third it shows Tribulation believers both inside and outside of Israel what to look for to help maintain their faith that He's coming to end their ordeal.  

Neither the Angel Gabriel nor the Lord misled Israel by not mentioning this indeterminate pause between the 69th and 70th weeks of Daniel's prophecy.  At least up to the cross and maybe all the way to the Ascension the Lord's offer of a Kingdom to Israel was on the table. The 40 days the Lord spent in Israel between the resurrection and the Ascension could well have been Israel's time of testing (40 is the number of testing), their last chance to accept the Kingdom.  This could also explain why the Gospel received limited exposure  among the Gentiles during and immediately after the Lord's ministry and why it was 20 years after the cross before the doctrine of the Rapture was introduced.

Clearly the Olivet Discourse was given primarily to Israel and doesn't mention the Church.  No matter what view you hold of the sequence of End Times events, if you've based it on an assumption that the disciples represent the Church in the Olivet Discourse, it's time to re-think your assumption. 06-13-09