And I will bless those who bless you,
And the one who curses you I will curse,
And in you all the families of the earth shall
be blessed.
- God to Abraham (Genesis 12:3)
The
last couple of years the secular community and some in the religious community
have woken up to the fact that most of the American Evangelical community is
pro Israel. Guess what? They do not like it one bit. There have been a
number of articles in the media about the alleged dangers of the Christian
support for Israel. A widely noted article appeared in the May 23, 2002 issue
of the Wall Street Journal entitled,
" How Israel Became a Favorite Cause of Christian Right." For some, this is
horrifying.
Current Christian
Zionism
At
the beginning of this article I have quoted Genesis 12:3, which is God' s
promise to bless those who bless Abraham and his descendants (i.e., Israel).
Does this promise still stand or has it been changed? If the Bible is to be
taken literally and still applies to Israel and not the church, it should not
be surprising to anyone that such a view leads one, such as myself, to
Christian Zionism. Zionism is simply the desire for the Jewish people to
occupy the land of Israel. Christian Zionists are Christians who advocate this
belief.
Back
in the spring of 1992, Christianity Today did a cover story on Christian Zionism. The article " For the Love
of Zion" (March 9, 1992; pp. 46-50) reflected a generally negative tone toward
Christian Zionists, which is normal for Christianity Today. They made the case that evangelical support
for Israel is still strong but it has peaked and is declining. Yet, today,
over a decade later the consensus appears to be that Christian Zionism is
getting stronger, but so are those Christians who oppose it.
In
February 2003, the Zionist Organization of America released extensive polling
results from the polling firm of John McLaughlin and Associates indicating
rising support by Americans of the modern state of Israel as against the Arab
Palestinian state. 71% of Americans were opposed to creating a Palestinian
state and by almost the same margin Americans oppose any support to the
Palestinian Arabs. Much of this current support is surely generated by those
who are classified as Christian Zionists.
Christian
Anti-Zionists
Probably
for the first time ever, an organized effort appears to be on the rise of
Christians (many who are Evangelical) who are outspoken Anti-Zionists. Knox
Theological Seminary, founded and headed by D. James Kennedy (interestingly Dr.
Kennedy did not sign the document) has posted a document on their web site
denouncing those who are supportive of the modern state of Israel as engaged in
" a serious misreading of Holy Scripture." Oh really!
Stephen
Sizer is writing a major new book against Christian Zionism. I guess we have
gotten so bad that they believe one is necessary. It will be called Christian
Zionism: Fueling the Arab-Israeli Conflict, due out in December 2003 from Intervarsity Press. Colin Chapman
has written what amounts to an anti-Zionist book in Whose Promised Land?
The Continuing Crisis Over Israel and Palestine, Baker, 2002. He attempts throughout his work to
refute the biblical teaching about ethnic Israel' s right to the land of Israel.
Gary
DeMar has for many years exhibited his anti-Zionism in the many incarnations of
Last Days Madness (American
Vision, 1999). pp. 407-23. In an appendix entitled " ' Anti-Semitism' and
Eschatology," DeMar quotes from Assembly of God premillennialist, Dwight Wilson' s
Armageddon Now!, (Baker,
1977) saying that premillennialism fostered anti-Semitism during the Holocaust.
Both Wilson and DeMar have made a statement that is ridiculous and cannot be
supported from the facts of history. DeMar says, " Wilson maintains that it was
the premillennial view of a predicted Jewish persecution prior to the Second
Coming that led to a ' hands off' policy when it came to speaking out against
virulent ' anti-Semitism.' " [1]
Wilson
and subsequently DeMar' s interpretation of the premillennial record on this
matter is simply wrong. Instead, historian David Rausch is correct when he
declared:
This theory of
" Fundamentalist anti-Semitism" is not only biased- it is totally inaccurate.
Fundamentalist Protestants are not historically anti-Semitic, nor are they
anti-Semitic at the present time. In fact, Fundamentalism is itself a
religious movement which grew out of a millennialism which was Zionist.
Fundamentalists are ardent supporters of Israel and the Jewish heritage.[2]
Convoluted
Calvinism
Calvinist
DeMar must be desperate in his attempt to label dispensational
premillennialists as anti-Semitic, that he would adopt and advocate Wilson' s
Arminian logic in relationship to the sovereign decrees of God. Wilson' s
interpretation that the premillennial belief in the certainty of the
fulfillment of prophetic decrees from the Bible leads to fatalistic inactivity
by its adherents is not only factually wrong, but would be rejected by DeMar as
theologically wrong if he had applied his Calvinism to all issues involving the
sovereignty of God and human responsibility.
DeMar
does not believe, nor do I, that because God has decreed who will be saved and
who will remain lost that the believer' s response should be fatalistic
inactivity in regards to evangelism or any decreed fact of history. History
shows that Calvinists have led the way in evangelistic concern and activity.
History also shows that premillennialists have led the way in their support for
the Jewish people and Israel, and have led Christian opposition to
anti-Semitism, just as they are doing at the present time. If this were not
the case then there would not be all the press about our love and support for
Israel.
Hands
Off
Wilson,[3]
and therefore DeMar[4], made a number of mistakes in their
characterization of premillennialists in regards to anti-Semitism. Wilson
quotes a poem written by a premillennialist entitled " Hands Off" relating to
anti-Semitism. The poem is saying that those who have persecuted the Jews
would be better off keeping their hands off of God' s people because God will
judge them for their sin. Wilson characterizes the poem as if the author was
advocating a hands-off policy of Christians toward helping the downtrodden Jew.
The actual viewpoint of the poem was telling people like Hitler to keep their
hands off the Jews, not for Christians to be apathetic towards persecution in
Europe.
Hands
On
Contrary
to the Wilson/DeMar viewpoint, Rausch argues that premillennialists were
involved in fighting anti-Semitism and did not sit back and do nothing. Rausch
cites example after example of American and European premillennialists warning
against anti-Semitism in Europe (especially in Germany and Russia) during the
many Prophetic Conferences convened between 1878 and 1918.[5] Rausch
notes that American dispensationalist, Arno Gaebelein, a German immigrant,
" castigated Gentile Christendom in his lectures and writings for its attacks on
the Jew." [6] In 1895, Gaebelein, upon returning to
the US from a trip to Germany, sadly stated,
It
is only too true that Protestant Germany is Jew-hating, and we fear, from what
we have seen and heard, that sooner or later there will come another
disgraceful outbreak.[7]
The
fact of the matter is that there were not too many premillennialists in Hitler' s
Germany since most of Christianity in Germany at that time was of a liberal
variety. In my entire life thus far I have never met or heard of a liberal who
was premillennial. Much of the Christian resistance to Hitler came from those
who also hid Jews and they were often premillennial. Joop Westerville, a
leader in the underground was a Plymouth Brethren and has a prominent place in
the Israeli memorial to the " Righteous of the Nations." Corrie Ten Boom' s
family were premillennial and are synonymous in the minds of American
evangelicals with activism on behalf of the Jews in WW II. Rausch has noted,
" Contrary to popular opinion, this prophetic viewpoint (premillennialism)
combated anti-Semitism and sought to reinstate the biblical promises that God had
made to the Jewish people through Abraham- biblical promises that postmillennial
Christendom had determined were null and void." [8]
Further
Wilson Confusion
Wilson
says that premillennialists like Gaebelein " seemed to provide legitimacy for
the Nazi attitude" [9] because, on a few points, they were
critical of some Jewish activities and because they did not believe that the
anti-Semitic document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was a forgery. Wilson portrays premillennialists
as if belief that the Protocols
were not forged was belief that they were true. Premillennialists like
Gaebelein thoroughly disagreed with the anti-Semitic agenda of the Protocols, but Wilson does not bring this out.
Premillennial criticism could not in any way be interpreted as anti-Semitic
attitudes. Rausch, contra Wilson, has observed: " It was premillennial
eschatology that led the early Fundamentalist to have a high view of Jewish
history and Jewish heritage. Even in negative remarks, there is no malevolence
toward the Jewish people because the Proto-Fundamentalist believed that all men
were unworthy of God' s grace and that even the Proto-Fundamentalist was a
sinner." [10]
Dispensationalist Love
for Zion
I
believe that it is safe to say that there has not been a group of Christians
who have cared more for the Jewish people and their destiny than
dispensationalists in the 2,000-year history of the church. Previous to the
rise of dispensationalism, Christians did not seem to be able to acknowledge
that God had a future plan of glory for national Israel, without at the same
time making the church subordinate to Judaism.
J.
N. Darby, the father of modern dispensationalism, developed his theology in the
1820s and 1830s by saying that God' s plan for history included two peoples,
Israel and the church. Darby took the Old Testament literally and at face
value so that he recognized Israel' s future destiny. At the same time, he took
the New Testament and the church literally and at face value. Darby did not
have to spiritualize either Israel or the church recognizing from the Bible two
peoples of God. " J. N. Darby has testified that it was his coming to
understand that ' there was still an economy to come, of His ordering; a state
of things in no way established as yet' which compelled him to formulate his
distinction between Israel and the church." [11] Because of the rise
of the dispensational viewpoint " premillennialists were able to stress the
evangelization of the Jews while at the same time they supported Jewish
nationalistic aspirations." [12]
In
fact, the heightened interest in dispensational evangelization of the Jews has
been recently documented in a new study of the history of Jewish evangelism.
Yaakov Ariel says,
The
rise of the movement to evangelize the Jews in America also coincided with the
rise of Zionism, the Jewish national movement that aimed at rebuilding
Palestine as a Jewish center. The missionary community, like American
dispensationalists in general, took a great deal of interest in the
developments among the Jewish people. . . .
Perhaps
not surprisingly, missionaries to the Jews were among the major propagators of
the dispensationalist premillennialist belief. . . .
They condemned
anti-Semitism and discrimination against Jews worldwide.[13]
William
E. Blackstone
Dispensational
theology explains why this form of premillennialism has been the most effective
in evangelizing Jews, while at the same time standing with Jews in causes like
Zionism. In fact, dispensationalists were the earliest advocates of Zionism,
even before it began within the Jewish community. " Zionism humanly speaking
owes its origin not primarily in the Jewish fold, but in the efforts of a
Christian, one whom we all respect, and who has been a great friend of Jewish
Missions, William E. Blackstone." [14] Benjamin Netanyahu also recognizes
the early rise of Christian Zionism when he declared that it " antedates the
modern Zionist movement by at least half a century." [15]
Blackstone' s
contribution was acknowledged by the Jewish community in 1918 by Elisha M. Friedman,
secretary of the University Zionist Society of New York, who said, " A
well-known Christian layman, William E. Blackstone, antedated Theodor Herzl by
five years in his advocacy of the re-establishment of a Jewish state." [16]
Contrary to the image presented by DeMar and Wilson, Blackstone provides
another example of premillennial " hands on" involvement in combating
anti-Semitism. " After traveling to Europe, Egypt, and Palestine in 1888,
Blackstone organized in Chicago in 1890 one of the first conferences between
Christians and Jews. The Jews of Russia were being persecuted and William
Blackstone felt that mere resolutions of sympathy were inadequate." [17]
Conclusion
In
spite of our critics, who unjustly attempt to cast us in a bad light,
dispensational premillennialism has always been the best friend the Jewish
people have ever had within Christendom. For years many in Israel have
recognized this. What is amazing is that in the last few years even the
Orthodox community has come to realize that they have friends and supporters
within the conservative Christian community. At the same time that we support
Zion, dispensational premillennialists have been the leaders in evangelizing
the Jewish community during the present church age. I believe that such support
of Zion by Christians will continue to be the case from now throughout all
eternity. Maranatha!
