|
By Ron Graham
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to
usurp authority over the man, but to be in
silence. For Adam was first formed, then
Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the
woman being deceived was in the
transgression.”
1 Timothy
2:12-14.These Bible verses have
certainly seen their fair share of
controversy over the years. Battles rage
over just exactly what Paul meant here and
was he just speaking culturally to those
folks at that particular time in history?
For the answer to that question the Apostle
Paul takes us clear back to the book of
Genesis.
Many people don’t really have a clue about
the deception that took place in the Garden
of Eden.
“Now the
serpent was more subtil than any beast of
the field which the LORD God had made. And
he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said,
Ye shall not eat of every tree of the
garden?”
Genesis 3:1.
First of all we must ask the question “Why
did the serpent (Satan) seek out the women
to confront with his lies instead of Adam?”
Satan brought his temptation against the
woman because he perceived she was more
vulnerable to attack. This is because she
did not receive the command to not eat of
the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
directly from God, but through Adam.
“And the LORD God took the man, and put him
into the garden of Eden to dress it and to
keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man,
saying, Of every tree of the garden thou
mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not
eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest
thereof thou shalt surely die.”
Genesis
2:15-17. God gave the clear
command to Adam. Then, when God created Eve,
Adam made God’s prohibition of that
particular tree and fruit clear to her. But
Eve probably didn’t really pay all that much
attention to Adam when he passed on God’s
command not to eat of the fruit of the tree
of the knowledge of good and evil because
when the serpent (Satan) questioned Eve as
to whether or not God said they couldn’t eat
of the fruit of that tree, she responded
with “We
may eat of the fruit of the trees of the
garden: But of the fruit of the tree which
is in the midst of the garden, God hath
said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall
ye touch it, lest ye die.”
Genesis
3:2-3.
We
must take notice of the fact that Eve’s
knowledge seems to be lacking. She doesn’t
name the tree of whose fruit she and Adam
were to abstain from eating.
Actually, Eve’s first mistake was in
carrying on a discussion with Satan. “The
Lord rebuke you” should be our only words as
we address Satan. As we can see, Eve’s
apparent lack of knowledge makes her all the
more vulnerable to deception. She then went
from bad to worse as she misquoted the
command God gave to Adam. Her words, “Ye
shall not eat of it” and “lest
ye die” are close enough, but she
added to the command and put words in God’s
mouth when she said, “neither
shall ye
touch it.” The major consequence
we see that arises from putting words in
God’s mouth is we begin to teach the
doctrines of men as if they are the
commandments of God.
“But in
vain they do worship me, teaching for
doctrines the commandments of men.”
Matthew
15:9. It’s interesting just how
many of mans idiosyncrasies have become
doctrinal mandates in our Churches today.
Secondly, Eve was deceived but her husband
was not deceived
“And Adam
was not deceived, but the woman being
deceived was in the transgression”
1 Timothy
2:14. Satan perceived Eve to be
the weaker link in the chain and so he
approached her with his lies, sure enough
she fell into transgression.
By
taking us back to the beginning, Paul
precludes any arguments that might arise
concerning women teaching or usurping the
authority of men as being a cultural issue
of that society. Paul’s admonition was not a
cultural issue then, nor is it now; it’s God
speaking through Paul.
God
knew what would happen if women were allowed
to teach men and to usurp authority over
them. Sure enough, the majority of the cults
today were begun by women who have
manipulated the scriptures so that they
could, without fear of condemnation, rise to
positions of authority over men.
Over the past few decades women have become
pastors of churches because of a
lackadaisical attitude on the part of the
Church, not to mention men’s ignorance of
scriptures. So what do we see happening
today? The completely erroneous rendering of
the truth of the scriptures by those who
wish to supplant God’s word. “But
I suffer not a woman to teach:“
The word “suffer” used by Paul is from the
Greek word “epitrepō”
and it actually means “permit”. Paul says he
does not permit a woman to teach or usurp
authority over a man. Women are not free to
usurp authority over men nor are they at
liberty to become pastors of Churches.
I
know that I’ll receive a massive amount of
letters disputing Paul’s stance on women in
a pastoral position. Many will attack me for
even suggesting there’s a problem with women
being in a position of authority over men.
They’ll march out Debra, Esther, Lydia, and
Priscilla. None of whom were priests or
pastors of Christian Churches. And knowingly
or not they will be attacking God.
“This is a true saying, If a man desire the
office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband
of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good
behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to
teach;”
1 Timothy
3:1-2. A bishop must be the
husband of one wife. Bishop, Elder, Pastor
is what the text refers to. The Greek word
for husband is “anēr”,
a masculine noun with the following
description: of a male, of a husband, of a
betrothed or future husband, any male. And
the Greek word of wife is “gynē”, a feminine
noun. A description of the word “gynē” is: a
woman of any age, whether a virgin, or
married, or a widow, a wife, a betrothed
woman. There can be no doubt as to what Paul
was saying: no to women pastors, no to women
teaching men. The text is clear.
We
are all called to proclaim the Gospel to all
nations, men and women alike. This means we
explain the Gospel of Christ to anyone who
will listen. Jesus Himself told us to do
this simple thing. Speaking the truth of the
Gospel is witnessing and possibly sharing
your testimony with others. This is a far
cry from where we see women have advanced to
in today’s Christian Churches. Senior
pastors, presidents of Christian seminaries
and universities usurping authority over
men.
“One that ruleth well his own house, having
his children in subjection with all gravity;
(For if a man know not how to rule his own
house, how shall he take care of the church
of God?)”
1 Timothy
3:4-5. So we can see plainly that
Paul only wants men who are capable of
rearing their children in the admonition of
the Lord. Not once does Paul include women
in the mix of Bishop/Elder/Pastor, or
Deacons for that matter. There are probably
many well meaning women in leadership roles
in churches who only wish to serve God with
all their heart. But God’s word is firm and
to the point, no women pastor, elders,
bishops, or deacons in My Church.
“Likewise must the deacons be grave, not
doubletongued, not given to much wine, not
greedy of filthy lucre; Holding the mystery
of the faith in a pure conscience. And let
these also first be proved; then let them
use the office of a deacon, being found
blameless. Even so must their wives be
grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in
all things.”
1 Timothy
3:8-11. Women who bypass the
clear exegetical rendering of scriptures to
pursue and obtain the office of
Pastor/Elder/Deacon are in full
contradiction to God’s word, and so are the
men who’ve allowed this error to escalate.
Here’s a little side note: In this same
verse “the
husband of one wife” has also
been quite controversial in regards to men
who’ve been divorced being excluded from
holding the position of pastor of a Church
or even that of Elder or Deacon. Paul was
keenly aware of the pervasiveness of the
cultural acceptance of taking in marriage
multiple wives. But Paul in no way excluded
men who were biblically divorced from
entering the ministry or holding the office
of elder or deacon. After all it was Jesus
Christ (God Almighty) Himself who said that
in the case of adultery divorce was
acceptable. Who was it acceptable to? To
God. Jesus put no restrictions on a man who
divorces his wife for infidelity on her
part, especially by excluding him from the
ministry of preaching, or holding the office
of elder, deacon or even a Bible teacher.
This exclusion by many denominations has
left many capable men who were called by God
Himself into the ministry out in the cold.
God says go and preach my word, and the
Church says no. Makes a lot of sense doesn’t
it?
Interestingly too, if the whole counsel of
Scripture is bypassed, should we not also
exclude Paul (who wasn’t married) and Jesus
Christ Himself from being leaders of the
Church or teaching? Of course not, what we
must do is work within the boundaries of
scripture instead of the boundaries of men.
Certainly by now the majority of the readers
should see that Paul is quite adamant about
the exclusion of women in the preaching
ministry. Remember this verse?
“All
scripture is given by inspiration of God,
and is profitable for doctrine, reproof,
correction and instruction in
righteousness.”
2 Timothy
3:16. In other words, these
verses I’ve included in this commentary are
not just written by Paul the Apostle, but
they were God breathed. If Paul says he does
not allow women to teach or usurp authority
over men, then we can be assured those words
came from the Creator of the Universe.
If
you are in a Church where your pastor is a
woman then you are fundamentally standing
with her, thus you’re standing against God.
Ignoring the scriptures placed above even
after looking into the Greek only makes your
case weaker. Corrupting and manipulating
those same scriptures, twisting them to say
what you want them to say, or interpreting
them contrarily to the exegetical norm won’t
cut any ice with God when you try to explain
your disobedience to Him concerning His
word.
Lastly, I feel I must address the idea of
homosexual pastors. A homosexual
bishop/pastor/elder/deacon cannot possibly
fulfill the requirement set down by God
Almighty in which a man must be the husband
of one wife. God sets the parameters, not
man. God created male and female for a
reason.
“Therefore shall a man leave his father and
his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife:
and they shall be one flesh.”
Genesis 2:24.
The word used here in the Hebrew for man is
“'iysh” and means male, man, opposite of
female. And the Hebrew word for wife is
“'ishshah” and the description in the
concordance is – woman, female, opposite of
male. Absolutely no confusion here.
“So
God created man in his own image, in the
image of God created he him; male and female
created he them. And God blessed them, and
God said unto them, Be fruitful, and
multiply, and replenish the earth, and
subdue it…”
Genesis
1:27-28. Homosexuals cannot
multiply, they cannot replenish the earth,
and they are actually a deterrent to
replenishing the earth. Thus they stand
diametrically opposed to God Almighty.
The
Homosexual lifestyle is an affront to God
and His inerrant word, and He would never
condone the ordination of a women pastor,
let alone a lesbian, to pastor a church. How
in the world does a lesbian fulfill the
requirement of “the
husband of one wife?” It’s
impossible. Again, it’s a case of people
thinking that the Bible is not to be taken
literally. God knew what would happen to His
Church if these abominations were allowed to
spread, and He tells us of the apostasy in
the last days. People, we are there. Now
women pastors and even homosexuals are
taking over many of the mainstream
denominations all because they either
misinterpret the scriptures or they dismiss
the word of God as simply metaphors and
allegories and mostly irrelevant to society
today.
Do
you really want to be taught the scriptures
by someone who avoids those verses that are
clearly contrary to their position? Does
“be ye not
deceived” come to mind? Where’s
all this headed? God knows.
“Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh,
shall he find faith on the earth?”
Luke 18:8.
God
bless you all,
Ron
Graham
twotug@embarqmail.com
All
scripture is from the KJV
|
| |